Antiphospholipid IgG Certified Reference Material ERM-DA477/IFCC: a tool for aPL harmonization?
Grossi C, Deprez L, Bodio C, Borghi MO, Kumar S, Pozzi N, Macor P, Piantoni S, Tincani A, Radin M, Sciascia S, Martos G, Monogioudi E, Zegers I, Sheldon J, Willis R, Meroni PL
OBJECTIVES: The Certified Reference Material (CRM) ERM®-DA477/IFCC is a new polyclonal IgG anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) material for the harmonization of the laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We evaluated CRM's ability to represent the heterogeneity of APS patient anti-β2GPI antibodies and to calibrate IgG anti-β2GPI methods.
METHODS: We characterized CRM for its reactivity against domain-1, using the QUANTA Flash® β2GPI-domain-1 assay, and against domains-4-5 of β2GPI, and single-domain-deleted β2GPI molecules using in-house ELISAs. We used QUANTA Lite® ELISA, QUANTA Flash® CLIA, and EliA™ FEIA methods to evaluate the CRM's anti-Cardiolipin (anti-CL) activity. Four anti-β2GPI IgG methods (in-house and QUANTA Lite® ELISA, QUANTA Flash® CLIA, and EliA™ FEIA) were also used to evaluate the CRM's calibration efficacy, alongside 133 clinical samples (CSs) and 99 controls.
RESULTS: The CRM showed high anti-domain-1 activity and no anti-domain-4-5 activity at the recommended assay dilution. The domain-dependent-β2GPI reactivity profiles were comparable with full-blown APS. There was acceptable dilution linearity for anti-CL assays with R2 ranging from 0.957 to 0.997. For the four anti-β2GPI IgG assays, calibration with the CRM led to a good comparability of the average result of CSs for two of the assays. New cut-offs calculated from this work improved comparability in quantitative results between three of the assays: 85 % concordance with CRM compared to 66 % concordance with assay-specific-calibration.
CONCLUSIONS: The CRM is representative of patient anti-β2GPI/CL heterogeneity and should improve anti-β2GPI IgG method harmonization. However, the level of achievable method harmonization is affected by differences in the selectivity among the assays.
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2025-06-28